ozawa and thind cases outcome

Approximately a year later, in 1923, a similar case was presented to the Supreme Court of the United States. are words of common speech, to be interpreted in accordance with the understanding of the common man, synonymous with the word Caucasian only as that word is popularly understood . In the case United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind (decided in 1923), Thind, who had immigrated to the U.S. in 1913 to attend UC-Berkeley and fought in the U.S. Army in World War I, also claimed the right to citizenship by trying to convince the Supreme Court that "high-caste Hindus" should qualify as "free white persons." Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share research papers. Ozawa v. United States | Densho Encyclopedia UNITED STATES v. BHAGAT SINGH THIND. | Supreme Court | US Law | LII Thus Ozawa and other Japanese immigrants were denied the right to become citizens. Following on the Ozawa case, in which a Japanese American plaintiff had been denied citizenship on the grounds that although he might be white, he was not Caucasian, Thind's lawyers argued that as a high-caste Hindu of the Aryan race from north India, Thind was of Caucasian . Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856) Chicago History Museum / Getty Images. 2. A year later, Bhagat Singh Thind petitioned for US citizenship arguing that as the descendant of Aryan people, he was a member of the Caucasian race . However, the U. 1922 Takao Ozawa files for United States citizenship under . Bhagat Singh Thind, the court contradicted itself by concluding that Asian Indians were not legally white, even though science classified them as Caucasian. Remember Me Poem By Margaret Mead, Carrie Buck was a "feeble minded woman" who was committed to a state mental institution. With respect to case law, I'll definitely be introducing some cases that traditionally don't get covered, such as the Civil Rights Cases (1883), which gutted the Reconstruction-era Civil Rights Act; Ozawa (1922) and Thind (1923) which both deal with racist definitions of whiteness and immigration policy; Gomillion v. Indians are officially not white - that was the US Supreme Court's ruling 95 years ago, on February 19, 1923, in the case United States vs Bhagat Singh Thind. The Civil Rights Movement. Similarities between Romeo And Juliet and Much Ado About Nothing, Essay on Von Clausewitz: Similarities And Differences, Essay on Christianity And Islam Similarities, Essay on Grendel And Beowulf Similarities, Similarities Between Dracula And Macbeth Essay, Similarities Between Slavery And The Holocaust Essay, Similarities Between Egypt And Mesopotamia Essay, Similarities Between Batman And Spider Man Essay, Essay about Similarities Between Catcher In The Rye And The Great Gatsby, Personal Narrative: Mastering Baguette Essay. See also AAA Response to OMB Directive 15: Race and . read and wrote english Children born and taught American He had white skin SC defined white = caucasian Part III will then analyze the racial-prerequisite cases following Ozawa and Thind. However, on appeal by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the US Supreme Court deliberated the case of Bhagat Singh Thind just 3 months after ruling on Ozawa. In Ozawa v. United States, 260 U. S. 178, 43 Sup. University of Texas." Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States decided that Bhagat Singh Thind, an Indian Sikh man who identified himself as an Aryan, was ineligible for naturalized citizenship in the United States. Ozawa was a Japanese-American who argued for his eligibility for citizenship based on his skin tone and character, but was denied on account of the anthropology and racial science of the day that classified him as "Mongolian" and therefore not Caucasian. A Virginia law allowed for the sexual sterilization of inmates of institutions to promote the "health of the patient and the welfare of society." The story of Bhagat Singh Thind holds some valuable lessons. ozawa and thind cases outcome Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922) People v. Hall, 4 Cal. He attended the University of California for three years until 1906, when he moved to Honolulu and settled down. He attended the University of California for three years until 1906, when he moved to Honolulu and settled down. The two men, Ozawa and Thind, had argued that they had been committed residents of the United States and deserved citizenship based on their qualifications and devotion to the United States. Race: The Power of an Illusion comments on racialized citizenship through the examples of Ozawa v. United States and the resulting case United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind. . Nov. 16, 1936 Takao Ozawa dies in Honolulu.. TIMELINE OF EVENTS IN THIND . Thind v. United States (1923) Summary Contradicting the logic behind its ruling in Ozawa v. U.S., the Supreme Court found that Bhagat Singh Thind was also ineligible for citizenship even though as an Asian Indian, he would have been categorized as Aryan or caucasian, according the the prevailing racial science of the time. Part II will examine the Ozawa and Thind rulings and demonstrate how they failed to signal the triumph of a common-knowledge standard. this case: Was settlement the desired outcome in a case of such high social significance, or should the case have gone to trial and perhaps to a higher court for a definitive adjudication? the two changes which the committee has recommended in the principles controlling in naturalization matters and which are embodied in the bill submitted herewith are as follows: first, the requirement that before an alien can be naturalized he must be able to read, either in his own language or in the english language and to speak or understand Outcomes for Indians at Large After Thind's Supreme Court cases, naturalization of Asian Indians . A. ozawa and thind cases outcome. See also AAA Response to OMB Directive 15: Race and . [3] Ozawa tried to petition under the naturalization law, but he was ineligible as he was classified as Japanese. 10. US vs. Bhagat Singh Thind - Library Guides at UC Berkeley [7] The argument was that if Ozawa was denied citizenship based on his race, did the law consider the Japanese people an inferior race and Caucasians a superior race? this case: Was settlement the desired outcome in a case of such high social significance, or should the case have gone to trial and perhaps to a higher court for a definitive adjudication? Which branch of government proved to be most reliable in the advancement of civil rights? The succeeding years brought immigrants fromEastern, Southern and Middle Europe, among them the Slavs and the dark-eyed, swarthy people of Alpine and Mediterranean stock, and these were received as unquestionably akin to those already here and readily amalgamated with them. He took his case to the U. S. District Court in Hawaii to be reconsidered, but unfortunately his citizenship had been rejected once again. It was the descendants of these, and other immigrants of like origin, who constituted the white population of the country when, reenacting the naturalization test of 1790, was adopted, and, there is no reason to doubt, with like intent and meaning. . The Court declined to review the ethnological authorities relied on by the lower courts to support their conclusion or those advanced by the parties. The paper above was adopted by the AAA Executive Board on May 17, 1998, as an official statement of AAA's position on "race." In 1922, Ozawa v. United States showcased Takao Ozawa, a Japanese man who was born in Japan but resided in the United States for 20 years, claiming that Japanese people were "free White persons" and thus, should be eligible for naturalization. Thind v. United States (1923) Summary Contradicting the logic behind its ruling in Ozawa v. U.S., the Supreme Court found that Bhagat Singh Thind was also ineligible for citizenship even though as an Asian Indian, he would have been categorized as Aryan or caucasian, according the the prevailing racial science of the time. EFND Court Cases Flashcards | Quizlet The Power of an Illusion comments on racialized citizenship through the examples of Ozawa v. United States and the resulting case United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind. Contradicting the logic behind its ruling in Ozawa v. U.S., the Supreme Court found that Bhagat Singh Thind was also ineligible for View the full answer Transcribed image text : Describe the two Supreme Court cases regarding Asian Immigration: Ozawa v. Sanford, [1] Ozawa v. United States, [2] United States v. Thind, [3] and Buck v. Bell [4] reflect implicit and explicit racial assumptions tied to biological and genetic presumptions and stereotypes. Based off Thinds qualifications and class status. Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922); United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 . 3. For this activity ask students pay attention to the two cases: Takao Ozawa v. United States (1922) and Bhagat Singh Thind v. United States (1923). List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 260, "Ozawa v. United States | Densho Encyclopedia", "1922 Seventy-five Years Ago | AMERICAN HERITAGE", "The Nationality Law (Law No.147 of 1950, as amended by Law No.268 of 1952, Law No.45 of 1984, Law No.89 of 1993 and Law.No.147 of 2004,Law No.88 of 2008) Article 8", "Tokyo court upholds deportation order for Thai teenager born and raised in Japan", Immigration Reform and Control Act (1986), Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act (INTCA) 1994, Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) (1996), Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) (1997), American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA) (1998), American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21) (2000), Legal Immigration Family Equity Act (LIFE Act) (2000), Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to The United States (2021), Trump administration family separation policy, U.S. S law stated that only free whites had the right to become naturalized citizens. Takao Ozawa v. United States was a case in which the United States Supreme Court found Takao Ozawa, a Japanese-American who was born in Japan but had lived in the United States for 20 years, ineligible for naturalization. In addition, he married a Japanese woman who had also went through schooling in the U. Facts presented in court and in everyday life are important, and our role is important that we try our best to tell the truth to seek a just outcome to peoples' unreasonable behavior. A year later, Bhagat Singh Thind petitioned for US citizenship arguing that as the descendant of Aryan people, he was a member of the Caucasian race . because of his ancestral ties to the Caucasoid region as an Indian Sikh (see Thind (1923)). 323 US 214 (1944), is now widely regarded as reaching an indefensible outcome, but doing so in a way that ultimately proved to be of . [2] In 1894, he moved to San Francisco, California, where he attended school. In 1919, Thind filed a court case to challenge the revocation. Download File. Ozawa's case provided hope for Indian American Bhagat Singh Thind's citizenship case. Both of these cases prove that race and skin color DO NOT . Ultimately, it is an individual's personal responsibly to determine their outcome. Having lived in the United States for twenty years, Takao Ozawa finally applied for U.S. citizenship, but the government denied his application, arguing that since he had been born in Japan and was of the Japanese race, he was ineligible. Part III will then analyze the racial-prerequisite cases following Ozawa and Thind. All rights reserved. Thind was an Indian Sikh who was born in Punjab, India and later joined the U. The Ozawa case is a striking example of how whiteness was used as a defining factor of someone's worthiness to be American. See also AAA Response to OMB Directive 15: Race and . Course lectures and readings also examine the ways that the meaning of national citizenship was . Carrie Buck was a "feeble minded woman" who was committed to a state mental institution. -neither nation happy with outcome and leads to negative . The courts stated that the Japanese were not considered as "free white persons" within the meaning of the law. In 1922, Takao Ozawa, a Japanese-American man, was involved in a notable case on eligibility for American citizenship. ozawa and thind cases outcome - crabbsattorneys.com Yes, the court . The Supreme Court rejected Ozawa's arguments to become a naturalized citizen and ruled "that white was synonymous with Caucasian ." The trial's outcome identified people of color as second hand citizens with respect to racial segregation. the court would not be bound by science, in policing the boundaries of whiteness. Case Argued: Oct. 11-12, 1944. United States was a Supreme Court case that was decided on December 18, 1944, at the end of World War II. 198 (1922) (Ozawa, a Japanese immigrant who had lived in the U.S. for over 20 years was "clearly ineligible for citizenship" because he "is clearly of a race which is not Her condition had been present in her family for the last three generations. When an enslaved person petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for his freedom, the Court ruled against himalso ruling that the Bill of Rights didn't apply to Black . ozawa and thind cases outcome - thebigretirementrisk.com Ozawa and Thind Essay.docx - Khedr 1 Ali Khedr Dr. Lorna United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind Ct. 65, 67 L. Ed. Part II will examine the Ozawa and Thind rulings and demonstrate how they failed to signal the triumph of a common-knowledge standard. Ozawa raised his family as an assimilationist adhering to white mores and was denied for not being caucasian. The Supreme Court, in Takao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922), a case originating in the Ninth Circuit, found that only Europeans were white and, therefore, the Japanese, by not being European, were not white and instead were members of an "unassimilable race," lacking status under any Naturalization Act. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education, Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education, Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. Facts presented in court and in everyday life are important, and our role is important that we try our best to tell the truth to seek a just outcome to peoples' unreasonable behavior. when will singapore airlines resume flights to australia, apartments for rent by owner allentown, pa, Lasalle Elementary School Baton Rouge, La, the berner charitable and scholarship foundation. Only three months after Ozawa, the Court took up the case of Bhagat Singh Thind, a South Asian immigrant and U.S. Army veteran, who petitioned for citizenship on the grounds that Indians were of. In United States v. The story of Bhagat Singh Thind, and also of Takao Ozawa - Asian immigrants who, in the 1920s, sought to convince the U.S. Supreme Court that they were white in order to gain American citizenship. Ozawa was born in Kanagawa, Japan, on June 15, 1875, and immigrated to San Francisco in 1894. . naturalization bar to Japanese immigrants was pursued by Takao Ozawa before the United States Supreme Court . how to pass the achiever test; macavity: the mystery cat analysis Ozawa raised his family as an assimilationist adhering to white mores and was denied for not being caucasian. More than Ozawas desire to prove that he was white and was similar to any other Caucasian, Ozawa wanted the courts to believe that he deserved citizenship on the basis of his honesty and dedication to the United States. A year later, Bhagat Singh Thind petitioned for US citizenship arguing that as the descendant of Aryan people, he was a member of the Caucasian race . In 1922, Ozawa v. United States showcased Takao Ozawa, a Japanese man who was born in Japan but resided in the United States for 20 years, claiming that Japanese people were "free White persons" and thus, should be eligible for naturalization. Takao Ozawa was a Japanese immigrant who challenged the definition of a "free white person" after applying for citizenship in Hawaii in 1914. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Ozawa, declaring that White was synonymous with "what is properly known as the Caucasian race," a classification that Japanese did not fall under. Further . 133 Oct. 3-4, 1922 The court hears oral argument on the matter. Thind's "bargain with white supremacy," and the deeply revealing results. The court ruled that Japanese people were not of the Caucasian race in ordinary usage, and would . No. Currently, president Donald Trump has issued a Muslim ban, which prevents muslims from several countries being able to enter the United States for 90 days. Race is defined as a category or group of people having hereditary traits that set them apart. 261 U. S. 214. As the paper is considered a living statement, AAA members', other anthropologists', and public comments are invited. It involved the legality of Executive Order 9066, which ordered many Japanese-Americans to be placed in internment camps during the war. Most people perceive race as only the color of ones skin; many people do not consider that being racial is not really about how a person looks but in essence it is about the how the society views different races and the opportunities and privileges associated with each race. The paper above was adopted by the AAA Executive Board on May 17, 1998, as an official statement of AAA's position on "race." As the paper is considered a living statement, AAA members', other anthropologists', and public comments are invited. Ryan, United States v. Nichols, United States v. Singleton, and Robinson v. Memphis & Charleston Railroad, would go all the way up to the Supreme Court. MyCase is available in almost every type of case. Whether it may be a Scandinavian man or a brown Hindu, ones race is not influenced by his or her ancestors. Expert Answer Ans . Only months before the Court heard Thind's case, it had ruled against Takao Ozawa, a Japanese immigrant who sued for his right to naturalize based on his beliefs and values, which he argued were as "American" as any white man's. Rather, it is a social construct that places barriers on the basis of outsiders perceptions of race. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind: On Gaining Citizenship & Losing Having achieved success in reversing the naturalization of Ozawa and Thind, the United States went after the citizenship eligibility of Armenian applicant Understanding Racism. In 1914, Ozawa filed for US citizenship under the Naturalization Act of 1906. relationship between democracy and diversity as well as the causes and outcomes of historical . Having achieved success in reversing the naturalization of Ozawa and Thind, the United States went after the citizenship eligibility of Armenian applicant The decision is a triumph for tolerance and will be cited as a precedent in more than 100 Supreme Court cases. This highly controversial idea comes to show that although solutions to certain issues can be found, our society will continue to associate ones actions and desires on his or her race, rather than what one desires to be racially perceived as. ozawa and thind cases outcome - sadiqindustries.com His family spoke fluent English and focused on American culture more than they did on Japanese culture. As I will argue, the courts applied Ozawa and Thind by emphasizing the primacy of a dramaturgy of whiteness. Race: The Power of an Illusion comments on racialized citizenship through the examples of Ozawa v. United States and the resulting case United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind. 198 (1922) (Ozawa, a Japanese immigrant who had lived in the U.S. for over 20 years was "clearly ineligible for citizenship" because he "is clearly of a race which is not These protests have centred on support for the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the One should note that there are a lot of court cases on "whiteness" in this period and they have contradictory outcomes. Refuting its own reasoning in Ozawa . With this idea in mind, neither Ozawa and Thind should not be considered white. . Takao Ozawa was born in Japan in 1875 and immigrated to San Francisco in 1894. Pay fines and fees. The Ozawa case is a striking example of how whiteness was used as a defining factor of someone's worthiness to be American. Racism is a word that is widely used and yet often carries many different meanings depending on who is using it. 399 (1854) Perez v. Sharp, 32 Cal.2d 711 (1948) . Korematsu v. United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (6-3) the conviction of Fred Korematsua son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, Californiafor having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II. They . because of his ancestral ties to the Caucasoid region as an Indian Sikh (see Thind (1923)). Bhagat Singh Thind with his batallion at Camp Lewis, Washington (1918). The Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Ozawa, declaring that White was synonymous with "what is properly known as the Caucasian race," a classification that Japanese did not fall under. Racial identity is the perception one forms of him or herself based on the racial group they most identify with. Ultimately, it is an individual's personal responsibly to determine their outcome. In Ozawa vs. United States, science was paired with common knowledge to deny Ozawa of citizenship. The claims made by the Supreme court in both the Ozawa vs. United States and United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind case are found to contradict one another. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education, Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. They . five letter words with l; jaiswal surname caste; pros and cons of herzberg theory; sechrest funeral home obituaries; curious george stuffed animal 1975; cornerstone staffing application 0 $ 0.00; Matthew Jacobson: Ozawa and Thind Court Cases-Ozawa: Japanese suing to be a citizen, doesn't get it because he's not caucasian, supreme court used science to say he's not a citizen-Thind: Indian, scientifically considered caucasian, court decided that science doesn't matter if you're not white . Contradicting the logic behind its ruling in Ozawa v. U.S., the Supreme Court found that Bhagat Singh Thind was also ineligible for View the full answer Transcribed image text : Describe the two Supreme Court cases regarding Asian Immigration: Ozawa v. He was 19 when he left Japan, the land of his birth, and never returned. File Size: 5969 kb. Contradicting the logic behind its ruling in Ozawa v. U.S., the Supreme Court found that Bhagat Singh Thind was also ineligible for citizenship even though as an Asian Indian, he would have been categorized as Aryan or caucasian, according the the prevailing racial science of the time. And Ozawa, having been born in Japan, was "clearly not a Caucasian." because of his ancestral ties to the Caucasoid region as an Indian Sikh (see Thind (1923)). Racism is a word that is widely used and yet often carries many different meanings depending on who is using it. In 1790, the framers decided that all free white persons shall be granted citizenship. The intention was to confer the privilege of citizenship upon hat class of persons whom the fathers knew as white, and to deny it to all who could not be so classified. Race is normally about the eyes, hair . The United States Supreme Court found Takao Ozawa, a Japanese-American who was born in Japan but had lived in the United States for 20 years, ineligible for naturalization. 399 (1854) Perez v. Sharp, 32 Cal.2d 711 (1948) . The trial's outcome identified people of color as second hand citizens with respect to racial segregation. Nov. 13, 1922 The Supreme Court reaches a decision holding that a person born in Japan is not eligible for naturalization as a U.S. citizen. The trials of Thind and Ozawa emphasize the parallel emergence of whiteness as an identity and . Readings include selected chapters in Lopez's White By Law, Ngai's Impossible Subjects and the Supreme Court's Wong Kim Ark, Ozawa and Thind decisions. Deseree Southard 02/26/2022 WRITING 1 Cases of Race In 1922 Ozawa, an Asian American, attempted to argue that "whiteness" should be based on the skin color of one ' s complexion. While the value and protection of whiteness throughout American legal history is Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922); United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 . Facts of the case. The upshot of this ruling was that, as with the Japanese, "high-caste Hindus, of full Indian blood" were not "free white persons" and were racially ineligible for naturalized citizenship. U.S. Reports: Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922). Takao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922), was a US legal proceeding. Some West Coast newspapers expressed satisfaction with the Ozawa decision, though the Sacramento Bee called for a constitutional amendment which would confine citizenship by right of birth in this country to those whose parents were themselves eligible to citizenship.[7], Japan is a strict jus sanguinis state as opposed to jus soli state, meaning that it attributes citizenship by blood and not by location of birth. Nowhere, however, does the original Constitution lay down a clear and comprehensive rule about either kind of . This law is limited to citizenship , any alien free white person who lived within limits View the full answer Here are 10 of the most astonishingly racist Supreme Court rulings in American history, in chronological order. Case #260 U.S. 178 (1922), affirmed that the United States Supreme Court found Takao Ozawa, a Japanese American ineligible for naturalization. These protests have centred on support for the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and the Yes, the court . The action of Congress in excluding from admission to this country all natives of Asia within designated limits, including all of India, is evidence of a like attitude toward naturalization of Asians within those limits. Having lived in the United States for twenty years, Takao Ozawa finally applied for U.S. citizenship, but the government denied his application, arguing that since he had been born in Japan and was of the Japanese race, he was ineligible. A grounded theory study was employed to identify the conditions contributing to the core phenomenon of Asian American activists (N = 25) mobilizing toward thick solidarity with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement in 2020. Download File. Mr. Ozawa, who was born in Japan but had lived in the United States for 20 years, filed for United States citizenship in 1915 under the. The Ozawa and Thind Supreme Court opinions - Multiracial Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856) Chicago History Museum / Getty Images. Although he had resided in the United States for 20 years, the Supreme Court deemed him ineligible for American citizenship by relying on then-considered "scientific" criteria for race. Although its not certain that the framers were intentionally excluding all African Americans and Asians, it is believed that the framers thought to only include all free white persons to avoid other races from invading the land to which the framers believed it to only belong to: free white persons. You can use MyCase to: See your case history (a record of what has happened in your case) See the papers that have been filed in your case. John Biewen: Hey everybody. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States decided that Bhagat Singh Thind, an Indian Sikh man who identified himself as an Aryan, was ineligible for naturalized citizenship in the United States. The decision is a triumph for tolerance and will be cited as a precedent in more than 100 Supreme Court cases. Only three months after Ozawa, the court took up the case of Bhagat Singh Thind, a South Asian immigrant and US army veteran, who petitioned for a citizenship on the grounds that Indians were of the Aryan or Caucasian race, and therefore white. The Supreme Court, in Takao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922), a case originating in the Ninth Circuit, found that only Europeans were white and, therefore, the Japanese, by not being European, were not white and instead were members of an "unassimilable race," lacking status under any Naturalization Act. Decision Issued: Dec. 18, 1944. issue of who could and could not become a naturalized U.S. citizen through US Supreme Court decisions in the cases of Takao Ozawa and Bhagat Thind.

Thomas Moser Obituary, Mccool Academy Bell Schedule, Articles O